typeofthinkingthatstrikesasbeingstunghiisstra,in

”publiitizen”aoatfeneralapathyandindifferenceof

henfeitsebelievediablishntofan”inviolablelahshould

individualsandthereasonistobefoundinthela.istoodangerous

foraoopublicspirited,itisnaturalthatheshouldtakeanapathetic

securetheelvesforlife.noliketobehyandtoliveinpeace

averagerunofkin

theseselvesknow.

thereportantpassagein

iedinbuildingtheirorytoavoidwar.byavoidingwar,

andanyattention.ofurse,they

本章已阅读完毕(请击下一章继续阅读!)

nersandpunishntshouldnotbeserveduptothelords9wehaveherea

attitudetoentfreedyand

punishntandreble.”hase

theyerid

hereoste,butwehavea

ntsratherthanthefulfilntofthelarue

fight.theyhertheygoforuback.thatisdangerousfor

anyprivateindividuals,”

statutesthatshouldbeappliedrigidly,sothathelahecleverwill

onesshallstandequal.”hepushedtheideaofaisticruleofthelahat

thepeopletoheiationalaffairs.hesaidi:”noo

notionotallyunese.

nceivedofalahehighandthelohecleveronesaupid

applytoboththerulerandtheruledalike.”hebelievedthatthelawshouldbe

andhofroeekingpeadhthisisthereason

reinpoor.noobeindangerandpovertynaturally,theyryto

itisstilltruetodaythatanyprivate

heinhissystehat”thekingshoulddonothing.”theking

shoulddonothing,becausehesahekingsuldnotdoanythinganyhe

rruptoffiuannaturethattheyshouldnotberrupt.

keepayou.thereforetheyindtheirownbusinessandwillbe

...

hebelievediteistic

ntrasttothenfuistdictuhat”urtesyshouldehe

subtaedfrobr>

supre,thatallpeopleshouldbeequalbeforethelahatthislawshouldbe

appliedinplaceofpersonalpreferendions.

theyouasktheoforsaketheiroilitaryservice,

legalistighty,and